Slashdot Log In
Interplanetary Superhighway
Posted by
michael
on Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:04 PM
from the asteroid-named-rest-stop dept.
from the asteroid-named-rest-stop dept.
rotenberry writes "The current issue of Caltech's Engineering and Science magizine contains the article "Next Exit 0.5 Million Kilometers - A Caltech/JPL collaboration explores the 'Interplanetary Superhighway.'" which describes "...the Interplanetary Superhighway - 'a vast network of winding tunnels in space' that connects the sun, the planets, their moons, and a
host of other destinations as well. But unlike the wormholes beloved of science-fiction writers, these things are real. In fact, they are already being used." However, it takes a very long time to get there."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Of course it takes a very long time....... (Score:5, Funny)
There's a bulldozer outside my house (Score:5, Funny)
We have one person to thank for this... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Oh they had better not.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:There's a bulldozer outside my house (Score:2)
Re:There's a bulldozer outside my house (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:There's a bulldozer outside my house (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
time for publishers to start... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:time for publishers to start... (Score:2)
Re:time for publishers to start... (Score:2)
Seven Rules For Spotting Bogus Science (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Seven Rules For Spotting Bogus Science (Score:3, Interesting)
Believe it or not, basic celestial mechanics still has several unsolved problems.
For instance noone knows exactly how to model the formation of ring structures like the Kuiper Belt [harvard.edu](a ring of asteroids orbiting the sun), or Saturn's rings.
If you don't believe me check out this link. [arizona.edu]
Re:Seven Rules For Spotting Bogus Science (Score:5, Informative)
Ehh... you're 3/4 right. Centripetal force is real and coreolis force is "imaginary". Centripital force is force towards the center of rotation, keeping you from traveling in a streight line. Centripital force doesn't make it hard to walk on the merry-go-round; centripital force allows you to stay on the merry-go-round. You're thinking of the "imaginary" centrifugal force that appears to counter-act the centripital force you are applying with your feet.
Centrifugal force and Coreolis force are both imaginary forces used as short hand for taking second time derrivatives (calclating accelerations) in rotating reference frames using polar coordinates . If you're spinning at a constant speed about the merry-go-round, you keep the same polar cooarinates when in fact, a lot of corce is acting on your body to keep it constantly changing direction at a fairly high rate. In the reference frame you ae always at rest, so you don't say that momentum change is balancing out the force you are using to keep yourself "still" in the rotating reference frame, you say that this imaginary "centrifugal" force is acting on you. The two statements are equivalent, but one is a technical gloss.
Now suppose you try moving in relation to the rotating reference frame. You want to travel in a streight line in the polar coordinates. Well, since the frame of reference is rotating, a streight path in non-rotating space is a curved line in the rotating reference frame, and the amount of aparent curvature is dependent on speed of travel relative to the rotating reference frame. So when you try and walk in a streight line on the merry-go-round with out correcting for rotation, you more or less walk in a streight line in the non-rotating reference frame. In the rotating reference frame, your path is curved. The easiest way to do calculations is to make up frorces that would havepushed your path into that curved shape. It's all just short hand so that everything doesn't need to be translated to and from the stationary reference frame.
Even at the equator, you experience the coreolis effect, it's just that your axis of rotation is parallel to the ground. At the equtor, running East appears to make you lighter, running West appears to make you heavier, jumping up appears to push you West, and dropping off a ledge appears to push you East. One explination of why thy always launch spacecraft in an eastwardly-traveling orbit is that that way the coreolis force helps, rather than hinders the spaceflight. In a non-rotating reference frame this is equivalent to saying that it already has a lot of speed in an easterly direction, so blasting off to the west actually means sloing down a lot rather than using the speed it already has due to traveling at the same speed as the ground.
It's all equivalent, sometimes it's jsut easier to do the math one way. If nobody has done the math to figure out how the imaginary forces get added in in your situation, then you need to translate everything into a non-rotaing, non-accelerating frame of reference and do the calculatins and translate them back into your rotating frame of reference.
It's kinda like special relativity. If you forget the formulas, you can re-derrive them by looking at everyhting in a stationary reference frame and looking at a photon clock and a photon yardstick and figuring out what apears to happen to one secodn and what appearsto happen to one meter and what appears to happen to one kg being acted upon by 1 Newton. It's just a lot easier if you remember the formulas Einstein derrived for you instead of having to transate everything to and from the stationary reference frame.
Parent
Re:Seven Rules For Spotting Bogus Science (Score:3, Informative)
The myth about no centrifugal or coriolis forces exists because it's easier to say that to freshman than to try to teach them to analyze forces within a rotating frame of reference.
huh? (Score:2, Interesting)
The structures aren't fixed (Score:5, Informative)
The thing about the wormholes is, though, that they're governed by non-linear dynamics, and are therefore extremely convoluted and difficult to calculate. But that doesn't imply that they're static, just that they're usually not the shortest distance between points A and B.
Parent
Re:The structures aren't fixed (Score:5, Informative)
These are even often refered to as "Highways on the Sea," and calling these "Interplanetary Superhighways" is no doubt derived from this.
Of course there is no actual structure.
The only real difference is that in space the "continents" are in continuous and *rapid* movement as well, and thus the "currents" and "winds" are in a constant state of flux.
Other than *that* Mrs. Lincoln. .
KFG
Parent
Re:The structures aren't fixed (Score:5, Informative)
NASA's been taking advantage of such "gravity assist" trajectories for a while. How do you get to Jupiter? Slingshot around Venus, flyby Earth twice, then you're on your way. It seems roundabout, but sometimes, paths like that are the easiest way.
Parent
Re:huh? (Score:2)
Re:huh? (Score:5, Informative)
It's not. You have to constantly calculate where the low energy paths will be and and then choose one that will take you where you want to.
When the planets move around these paths will change and to get to the same place you may have to take a different 'route' for journeys that start at different times.
Calling it a 'network of tunnels' is a poor simile, lets see if I can do any better. It's more like a set of deep valleys connected to each other over a small rise. The valleys are formed by the gravity of the planets and moons, and the layout of the valleys change as the planets move around.
To get from point A to point B, you can either use lots of energy to go in a straight line up and down the deep sides of the valley or if you follow the bottoms of the valleys and aim carefully at the connection between different valleys you can use less energy to move.
As space is frictionless, not only do you have to spend a lot of energy to get up the side of the valley (ie getting the spaceship up to speed for the journey), you also have to spend a lot of energy to stop from rolling on past where you want to go to (ie slow the spaceship down once it there). This is a problem if you want to send a probe to go and look at several planet/moons in a mission and spend a reasonable amount of time around each one. If you just accelerate/decelerate to get to and from each orbit you'll need a lot of fuel.
What's cool about this is that if you want to, you can bounce around within the valley so long as you don't roll at the low connection to another valley. This means that the spaceship/satellite could stay in one orbit around a moon for a while, and then when the time comes to move on, it can fire its rocket for a very short time just to aim at the low connection to the next valley. This will then make the ship move into orbit around the next planet/moon and it will be in a stable orbit around that until it decides to move on again.
Parent
Gravity Hitchhiking, Pure and Simple (Score:4, Funny)
Now if only I could get a free ride to the Midwest or East Coast this way.
yes, it takes a long time. (Score:5, Funny)
Ok... it's a friday night... I'm sitting at home, with nothing better to do than try and be a smartass on slashdot... Oh lord, I've wasted my life...
Re:yes, it takes a long time. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:yes, it takes a long time. (Score:3, Informative)
It'll Never Pan Out... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It'll Never Pan Out... (Score:2, Funny)
This Reminds me of Doug Adams (Score:3, Funny)
how this works (Score:2, Informative)
for those who didn't read the article... (Score:4, Informative)
for those who didn't understand the article ... (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't just a way to get from planet to planet using less fuel -- it's a way to get around using no more than a shove in the right direction, starting from between the Earth and Moon and ending up anywhere you want. That's not your father's rocket science, and it's bloody cool -- flashy language or not.
Parent
You are so full of crap (Score:5, Informative)
They have discovered a new type of route throughout the solar system, besides the conic sections typically used today, requiring orders of magnitude less energy. They can also predict up to 100 orbits into the future, with multiple ports of call on the itinerary, which is much more sophisticated than the simple slingshot method you're alluding to.
They are using chaos theory and orbital instability to their advantage. That is something most certainly not done in traditional conic orbital maneuvers, which are of such a short duration and simple nature that chaos and instability don't enter into it.
Parent
Oh the taxes (Score:5, Funny)
Any distributed computing people listening? (Score:5, Interesting)
Massive amounts of numbers to be crunched, tons of routes to be discovered, and all by lowly computers with nothing better to do.
Proving that some ungodly number of ProcHours can figure out a RC-72 bit key is meaningless to me.
This is the sort of science humanity is interested in. Onward to Mars [nw.net]!
-Brett
Re:Any distributed computing people listening? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Poincare Conjecture (Score:3, Informative)
The Poincare Conjecture [claymath.org]
IIRC, solving this problem should make some major advances in this 'tube-theory'. Can anyone explain how though?
---
Re:Poincare Conjecture (Score:3, Informative)
The article has nothing to do with this. The article is simply discussing searching for trajectories whihc minimize the energy to get from A to B. The tube/wormhole terminology seems awful, if not incorrect (wormholes are very different beasts).
Wait a minute... how long? (Score:3, Funny)
Plus, those gravitational speed ups are slowing down the planet! Eventually, we'll suck up so much momentum to cause the earth to stop revolving around the sun, and we'll burn up!
Act now to fight the destruction of our gravitational resources!
Gravity drive (Score:3, Insightful)
Bus, as far I understand, that "highway" must be very dinamic, is like saying that in a year, 6 months and 3 days there should be a "road" to Pluton, but if you try this every other moment it will be very costly or the trip will last 4 months more.
And, well, this "highway" is beloved as well for good hard sci fi writers, taking advantage of gravity to do "impossible" tricks is very used, and is funny to see everyone surprised in the story of that kind of tricks
Lagrange Points (Score:3, Informative)
This technique is used to keep the SOHO [nasa.gov] sun observation satellite at Lagrangian point 1 [montana.edu] in the earth/sun system, so that it keeps a constant view of the sun.
The concept behind this is extended in this instance to reveal tunnels which offer the 'path of least resistance.'
In fact, this has been discussed [slashdot.org] on Slashdot before. Slashdot users have also discussed Lagrangian points in relations to one [slashdot.org] or both [slashdot.org] of Earth's sub-moons.
Re:Lagrange Points (Score:4, Informative)
Evidently the research is more immediately useful for the techniques learned in complex multi-body interacting systems problems, which fluid dynamics guys are also fascinated in.
Parent
Home? (Score:5, Funny)
Where the space debris always collects,
We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams:
Solar power and zero-gee sex.
I am truly sorry for that one...
Where's LTOOL? (Score:3, Funny)
Some day... (Score:3, Insightful)
It'll get nudged this way and land in the back yard of the lucky (corporation, government, fill in the blank) via these EXACT orbital pathways.
When it does, you can tell the grandchildren, "Bah, that's OLD news. We were talking about it on slashdot before your PARENTS were even born."
The problem with nerds... (Score:4, Insightful)
... is that for the most part we have too much information in our heads, but no common sense to use it. This article does a wonderful job of illustrating, in a relitively reasonable manner, how we can do a lot of work traveling between planets without expending much energy!
BRAVO!!!
They have managed to move beyond their meager geekness and actually apply concepts that come from Lagrange, chaos theory, etc... and use them to better mankind and also explain previously unexplained phenomena.
I know way too many nerds who cannot do this for the life of them. They have lots of knowledge, but they are useless!!!
A bit of a rant... I know, but it's frustrating to read all the comments by idiots who can't even read the article before they reply...
Duplicate article from July 20, 2002 (Score:5, Informative)
oh dear (Score:5, Funny)
Hmmm... (Score:3, Funny)
Am I the only one who finds this redundant?!?! =P
Hmm.. who wants to start a project on sourceforge? (Score:5, Interesting)
You know I wonder if this idea opens the thoughts for an interplantary positioning system (IPS)... in order to know where you get off, you'd have to know where you are.
Cant we just walk? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Home On Lagrange (Score:4, Funny)
Where the three-body problem is solved,
Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K,
And the cold virus never evolved.
(chorus)
We eat algea pie, our vacuum is high,
Our ball bearings are perfectly round.
Our horizon is curved, our warheads are MIRVed,
And a kilogram weighs half a pound.
(chorus)
If we run out of space for our burgeoning race
No more Lebensraum left for the Mensch
When we're ready to start, we can take Mars apart,
If we just find a big enough wrench.
(chorus)
I'm sick of this place, it's just McDonald's in space,
And living up here is a bore.
Tell the shiggies, "Don't cry," they can kiss me goodbye
'Cause I'm moving next week to L4!
(chorus)
CHORUS:
Home, home on LaGrange,
Where the space debris always collects,
We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams:
Solar power and zero-gee sex.
--Home on Lagrange (The L5 Song)
© 1978 by William S. Higgins and Barry D. Gehm
http://www.jamesoberg.com/humor.html [jamesoberg.com]
(from very bottom of page)
Parent